Open Systems Architecture (OSA)
The open systems initiative at the Department of Defense began in November 29, 1994, when the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics directed that all DoD components and agencies use open systems specifications and standards for acquisition of weapon systems and chartered the Open Systems Joint Task Force (OSJTF) as a jointly sponsored oversight body to oversee the implementation of the new policy. The OSJTF charter was extended several times during the last 10 years with its mission, functions, and responsibilities transferred to the Systems and Software Engineering Directorate – now the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering (DASD(SE)).
The DoD preferred approach for implementation of open systems, previously called Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA), is now called Open Systems Architecture (OSA). OSA is both a business and technical strategy for developing a new system or modernizing an existing one. OSA enables acquisition and engineering communities to design for affordable change, employ evolutionary acquisition and spiral development, and develop an integrated roadmap for system design and development. Basing design strategies on widely supported open standards increases the chance that future changes to the system will be integrated in a cost-effective manner.
Open systems employ modular design, use widely supported and consensus-based standards for their key interfaces, and have been subjected to successful validation and verification tests to ensure the openness of their key interfaces. Open systems characteristics and principles may be dealt with as:
(1) design requirements (e.g., mandated open standards and protocols);
(2) derived requirements (e.g., need for open interfaces to enable interoperability);
(3) design constraints (e.g., need to adhere to open interface specifications as system components are designed);
(4) architectural attributes (e.g., need for an adaptable, upgradable, and reconfigurable system architecture);
(5) design considerations (e.g., taking into consideration modular and open systems design benefits and concerns); and
(6) business strategies to gain access to competitive sources of supply and effectively manage technological obsolescence.
Enclosure 1, section E1.1.27. Systems Engineering of the DoDD 5000.01 (The Defense Acquisition System) highlights consideration of MOSA by all programs: Acquisition programs shall be managed through the application of a systems engineering approach that optimizes total system performance and minimizes total ownership costs. A modular, open-systems approach shall be employed, where feasible. DoDI 5000.02 (Operation of the Defense Acquisition System) further discusses OSA in Enclosure 3 (Systems Engineering), Section 14: Program managers are responsible for applying open systems approaches in product designs where feasible and cost-effective.
Within Chapter 2 of the DAG, Section 220.127.116.11.3. Business Case Analysis (BCA) with Engineering Tradeoff Analysis highlights the need stating, "Business case development for open systems architecture and data rights is a process of analyzing alternative acquisition decisions to be undertaken for a given system to derive quantifiable costs as well as benefits for these alternative decisions. The business case should provide evidence that justifies an investment decision for the purposes of implementing (or not implementing) an open systems architecture or acquiring (or not acquiring) data rights for the program being examined." Chapter 2 also states the the Acquisition Strategy should summarize the make-or-buy approach to establish and maintain access to competitive suppliers for critical areas at system, subsystem, and component level (e.g., requiring an open-systems-architecture or a make-or-buy plan). List critical items and their sources.
The Defense Acquisition Guidebook Chapter 4 states that "OSA is identified as a key tenet of Better Buying Power, under Promoting Effective Competition, because it enhances system interoperability and the ability to integrate new capabilities without redesign of entire systems or large portions of the enterprise." These sections in DAG chapters 4 and 5 respectively, provide additional information: Sections 18.104.22.168 Open Systems Architecture and 5.3.1. Architecture Considerations.
Program managers are expected to plan for OSA implementation and to include a summary of such planning as part of the Systems Engineering Plan and the overall Acquisition Strategy. The summary of the OSA planning should describe:
(1) how OSA fits into a program's overall acquisition process and strategies for acquisition, technology development, and T&E;
(2) what steps a program will take to analyze, develop, and implement a system or a system-of-systems architecture based on OSA principles; and
(3) how such program intends to monitor and assess its OSA implementation progress and ensure system openness.
The DoD Open Systems Architecture Data Rights Team released the DoD Open Systems Architecture Contract Guidebook for Program Managers, v.1.1 , dated June 2013. The guidebook provides recommendations for writing an OSA-based statement of work, guidance on special interest requirements, recommended contract line items, and guidance on obtaining intellectual property and data rights to support full life-cycle competition and recommended CDRLs.
Programs can tailor the principles described in the guidebook to the acquisition of any system or service. The guide is intended to augment, rather than replace, existing contractual source materials such as the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). Users should consult the most recent versions of the FAR and DFARS, in addition to the guidebook, when developing acquisition materials.
For more information on open systems implementation please see DAU Continuous Learning Modules CLE 013 Modular Open Systems Approach to DoD Acquisition and CLE 012 DoD Open Systems Architecture (OSA), and the DAU Open Systems Architecture website.