Logo
  • SDC Home
  • Treaties and Agreements
    Active
    New Start Treaty (NST) Outer Space Treaty Agreement on Notifications of Launches of Ballistic Missiles (1988)
    Inactive
    Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty Strategic Arms Reduction Talks Treaty (START) Moscow Treaty Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM) START II Treaty
  • Related Links
  • Contact
  • ASD(A)

    Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition


    Delivering capability at the point of need through a Defense Acquisition System that is flexible, tailorable, and enables speed

    Contact ASD(A)

      Acquisition Data and Analytics

    • Principal Deputy, Acquisition Data and Analytics
    • Acquisition Approaches and Management
    • Intellectual Property Cadre

      Platform and Weapon Portfolio Management

    • Air Platforms and Weapons

    • Electronic Warfare

    • Surface Warfare

      Strategic, Space, and Intelligence Portfolio Management

    • Space and Missile Defense

    • C4/ISR
    • Strategic Deterrence and Capability
    • Nuclear Command, Control, and Communication

      Defense Pricing and Contracting

    • Policy Vault
    • Operations
    • eBusiness
    • Policy
    • Price, Cost & Finance
    • Regulations

      Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell

    • DA2 Cell Home

      Defense Acquisition University

      Defense Contract Management Agency

Inactive Strategic Treaties

Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty

  • Home
  • ABM Treaty
  • Putin Statement December 13, 2001

ABM Treaty: Putin Statement December 13, 2001

A STATEMENT MADE BY RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN ON DECEMBER 13, 2001, REGARDING THE DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO WITHDRAW FROM THE ANTIBALLISTIC MISSILE TREATY OF 1972

The US Administration today announced that it will withdraw from the 1972 ABM Treaty in six months' time.

The Treaty does indeed allow each of the parties to withdraw from it under exceptional circumstances. The leadership of the United States has spoken about it repeatedly and this step has not come as a surprise to us. But we believe this decision to be mistaken.

As is known, Russia, like the United States and unlike other nuclear powers, has long possessed an effective system to overcome anti-missile defense. So, I can say with full confidence that the decision made by the President of the United States does not pose a threat to the national security of the Russian Federation.

At the same time our country elected not to accept the insistent proposals on the part of the US to jointly withdraw from the ABM Treaty and did everything it could to preserve the Treaty. I still think that this is a correct and valid position. Russia was guided above all by the aim of preserving and strengthening the international legal foundation in the field of disarmament and non-proliferation of mass destruction weapons.

The ABM Treaty is one of the supporting elements of the legal system in this field. That system was created through joint efforts during the past decades.

It is our conviction that the development of the situation in the present world dictates a certain logic of actions.

Now that the world has been confronted with new threats one cannot allow a legal vacuum to be formed in the sphere of strategic stability. One should not undermine the regimes of non-proliferation of mass destruction weapons.

I believe that the present level of bilateral relations between the Russian Federation and the US should not only be preserved but should be used for working out a new framework of strategic relations as soon as possible.

Along with the problem of anti-missile defense a particularly important task under these conditions is putting a legal seal on the achieved agreements on further radical, irreversible and verifiable cuts of strategic offensive weapons, in our opinion to the level of 1,500-2,200 nuclear warheads for each side.

In conclusion I would like to note that Russia will continue to adhere firmly to its course in world affairs aimed at strengthening strategic stability and international security.


A STATEMENT MADE BY RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN ON DECEMBER 13, 2001, REGARDING THE DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO WITHDRAW FROM THE ANTIBALLISTIC MISSILE TREATY OF 1972

The US Administration today announced that it will withdraw from the 1972 ABM Treaty in six months' time.

The Treaty does indeed allow each of the parties to withdraw from it under exceptional circumstances. The leadership of the United States has spoken about it repeatedly and this step has not come as a surprise to us. But we believe this decision to be mistaken.

As is known, Russia, like the United States and unlike other nuclear powers, has long possessed an effective system to overcome anti-missile defense. So, I can say with full confidence that the decision made by the President of the United States does not pose a threat to the national security of the Russian Federation.

At the same time our country elected not to accept the insistent proposals on the part of the US to jointly withdraw from the ABM Treaty and did everything it could to preserve the Treaty. I still think that this is a correct and valid position. Russia was guided above all by the aim of preserving and strengthening the international legal foundation in the field of disarmament and non-proliferation of mass destruction weapons.

The ABM Treaty is one of the supporting elements of the legal system in this field. That system was created through joint efforts during the past decades.

It is our conviction that the development of the situation in the present world dictates a certain logic of actions.

Now that the world has been confronted with new threats one cannot allow a legal vacuum to be formed in the sphere of strategic stability. One should not undermine the regimes of non-proliferation of mass destruction weapons.

I believe that the present level of bilateral relations between the Russian Federation and the US should not only be preserved but should be used for working out a new framework of strategic relations as soon as possible.

Along with the problem of anti-missile defense a particularly important task under these conditions is putting a legal seal on the achieved agreements on further radical, irreversible and verifiable cuts of strategic offensive weapons, in our opinion to the level of 1,500-2,200 nuclear warheads for each side.

In conclusion I would like to note that Russia will continue to adhere firmly to its course in world affairs aimed at strengthening strategic stability and international security.

OUSD A&S Offices

  • Acquisition & Sustainment
  • Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition
  • Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment
  • Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs
  • Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Policy
  • Office of the Executive Director for Special Access Program Central Office
  • Office of the Executive Director for International Cooperation

Military Services Links

  • Army Acquisition
  • Army Sustainment
  • Army IE&E
  • Navy Acquisition
  • Navy Sustainment
  • Navy EI&E
  • Air Force Acquisition
  • Air Force Sustainment
  • Air Force EI&E

Resources

  • Accessibility | Section 508
  • Freedom of Information Act
  • DoD No FEAR Act
  • Plain Writing Act
  • Defense Strategic Plan
  • National Defense Strategy
  • USA.gov
  • Web Policy
  • External Link Disclaimer

DoD Links

  • US Department of Defense
  • USD Chief Management Office
  • USD Research & Engineering
  • USD Policy
  • USD Comptroller
  • USD Personnel & Readiness
  • USD Intelligence
  • DoD CIO
  • DoD Inspector General
Privacy & Security| Sitemap|

2022 Official U.S. Department of Defense Website